|


 
|
The Nay Sayers
I had read
and listened to many “horror stories” about the downside of
charter boat ownership. Everything
from charter guests trashing the boat to the lack of maintenance
was recounted in excruciating detail.
One thing that was common in most reports I read – the
details were second-hand – that is, the person who told the
story was never the boat owner.
It was always “I heard of one case …. [insert highly
embellished horror story here]”.
I could never figure out who these people were, because
you would think by the sound of them, they maintained their
boats immaculately. Now
I have been down the dock of many Yacht Clubs and sailed on many
boats, and I can tell you that from my limited experience, people do not
maintain their own boats all that well.
There is always something broken, scratched,
non-functional, or filthy dirty.
Certainly none of these owners are in a position to
criticize the state of charter boats.
Perhaps somewhere, hidden away in some forgotten part of
the planet (Brigadoon Yacht Club perhaps?), there is an entire
fleet of perfectly maintained boats.
I know that
nasty things can happen in the charter business, but I have
always believed that if you want to do something, you better
develop a thick skin to deal with the unpleasant things that
will happen along the way.
If not, be a spectator for the rest of your life.
Risk
Analysis
Charter
companies naturally try to focus your attention on the benefits
of charter boat ownership.
It is every bit as important to go into the deal with
your eyes wide open to all the risks, and be prepared for them
when, not if, they happen.
That way, a minor incident does not get blown out of
proportion and mutate into yet another “horror story”.
I learned
much from the many E-mail exchanges between Seth and I.
A pattern began to develop.
For every risk, there was an assessment of the
probability, a mitigation and contingency plan, and ultimately a
dollar value associated with the risk. Yes, it always came down to money. I found myself saying “so, if this happens, I’m out x
dollars, correct?” And,
as long as I could live with the amounts, I was OK.
Some of these
risks are summarized as follows:
|
Risk
|
Impact
|
|
|
| Revenue
shortfall |
The
break-even point was calculated at 15 weeks of charter.
I had been watching Barefoot’s “discount page”
on their Website over
the charter season and concluded that 15 weeks was indeed
possible. I
figured a worst-case scenario to be 12 weeks, and in that
rare case, I would be out $1,500 - $2,000.
I could live with that in an off-year.
|
| Abuse
by charter guests |
Charter
guests leave $1,000 cash deposit.
Damage/loss is covered through the deposit.
Damage in excess of $1,000 is covered by insurance.
That’s why you have it.
Risk -
zero.
|
| Wear
and tear |
The
maintenance budget was based on Barefoot’s experience in
running a charter operation.
They know the normal rate of wear and tear, when
things need to be replaced, and how much it costs.
Normal
replacement of components is a good thing, in that it
“replenishes” or “refurbishes” the boat as you go
along, and you use charter revenue to finance it.
Gelcoat
can be repaired and polished, interior wood can be restored,
mechanical equipment can be repaired, and sails, lines, seat
cushions, etc. can all be replaced.
I have done all of this stuff myself so I know it can
be done. It’s
no big deal, as long as charter revenue covers it.
Seth
indicated that there had never been a case in Barefoot’s
operation where charter revenue failed to fund
maintenance. I
could live with this.
|
| Excessive
Wear and Tear |
This
is probably the area of greatest risk. In that
scenario, over time,
wear and tear exceeds the rate of refurbishment.
One day, you realize that the boat is a wreck.
I had
heard anecdotal wear and tear stories,
but never first-hand reports where wear and tear exceeded
maintenance in such a way that charter boat ownership was a
real bad financial deal.
I was essentially willing to take the risk, and
decided that an aggressive maintenance/refurbishment
approach would keep me ahead of the wear and tear curve.
Barefoot
does not “turn” their boats same-day, that is, a
boat returned in the morning is not out on charter later
that day. While there is a slight revenue penalty for
not stringing charters back-to-back, this practice goes a
long way in keeping a boat looking good. The 24-48
hours is used to inspect, maintain, clean, and polish the
boat, a practice I believe keeps you ahead of the wear and
tear curve.
|
| Total
Loss |
Covered
by the insurance policy.
The first $1,000 comes from a charter guest if is
occurs on a charter. If
it’s not on charter, I pay the $1,000.
|
| Hurricanes |
St.
Vincent is below the normal path of hurricanes.
Barefoot has Helix hurricane moorings, bridles for
all the boats, and the Blue Lagoon is well-protected from
storm surge. Tyrrel
Bay hurricane hole in Carriacou is a $300 delivery problem,
and if you really had to run the boat to Venezuela, it’s a
$1,000 problem.
In all
the years Barefoot has operated, they have never had a
direct hurricane strike and never had to run the boats
south.
|
One day I
asked Paul Montgomery how he could sleep comfortably at night
knowing that a quarter-million dollar investment was floating in
some harbor in the Caribbean under the care and control of
people he hardly knew, being used by people he never met.
His response was spot-on in that it settled my discomfort
completely. Basically,
he said, “If you are at all concerned about any of these
things, charter boat ownership is not for you.”
During the
long year leading up to my purchase, I had assembled a
“support team” that I bounced ideas off.
These people later went on to become my core crew
on The Usual Suspects.
There were many times that I almost gave up the goal, but
these people dusted me off, and proceeded to “lie” to me,
telling me that I must never give up.
Thanks to them, I saw the plan through.
It was Gord
who provided another sound piece of advice one day.
He stressed the importance of simply putting the boat out
of my mind when I was not on it.
He said, “Let Barefoot deal with the day to day stuff,
stay out of it completely, treat it like a commodity. Basically, forget about the boat completely until the time you
go down to use it.” Good
advice for those who want to enjoy a good night’s sleep.
Trial
Charter
In November
1998, I took the helm of Paul Montgomery’s Moorings 510,
chartered from Barefoot, in an effort to determine if this was
really for me. I
had the opportunity to check out Barefoot’s operation, the
cruising grounds, and meet with Seth in person finally.

My initial
impressions were mixed. Yes,
the sailing was real fun, and The Grenadines were nothing short of
spectacular! However, I was initially concerned that The Grenadines might not be suitable for living aboard.
There are virtually no marina facilities and it’s
really quiet (all reasons that people vacation here).
Essentially, you would need to spend most of your time at
anchor, and the higher winds and waves would take some
getting used to. Barefoot was indeed a credible
and thoroughly professional operation, however small.
Personal service seemed to be the motto here - I liked that.
I
did not return from that trip starry-eyed or completely
sold on the idea. In
a way, it was good, because I remained objective about the whole
thing. I had in
fact put the idea on the back burner for a while when my support
team swooped in and over several Rummers, forced me to “take
the plunge”. Next
morning, before I fully knew what I was doing, I E-mailed Seth
and told him I was ready to proceed.
There was no turning back.
|

 
|
|
Last Updated: November 1, 2000
Copyright © 2000 |